When to choose Fixed-Scope
You have a strict, non-negotiable budget and a highly detailed PRD (Product Requirements Document). You need a specific outcome by a specific date.
We align our commercial structure with your operational reality. Whether you need a tightly scoped MVP or a dedicated engineering pod for ongoing scale, we have a model that fits.
A clear breakdown of how we structure our engineering partnerships.
| Decision criteria | Netcurion | Standard Agencies | In-House Teams |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Defined outcomes or ongoing delivery | Project-based delivery | Long-term internal ownership |
| Starting point | Discovery, scope, and delivery plan | Brief and proposal | Hiring and internal planning |
| Scope changes | Visible trade-offs and reprioritisation | Change request or new estimate | Managed within team capacity |
| Technical ownership | Direct engineering involvement | Varies by delivery model | Retained internally |
| Handover | Code, documentation, and operating context | Varies by contract | Already within the business |
| Best next step | Choose the model around the problem | Compare project proposals | Plan permanent headcount |
Don't know which one fits? Here's how we typically advise clients.
You have a strict, non-negotiable budget and a highly detailed PRD (Product Requirements Document). You need a specific outcome by a specific date.
You are building a complex SaaS or enterprise product where requirements will inevitably change as you learn from users. You want a stable team that understands your business context.
Share your business goals and constraints, and we'll recommend the commercial structure that minimizes your risk.